| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
PAPER ABSTRACT ASTM E-7 Committee: International Symposium on Acoustic Emission - 1998 ISBN # (In Press) This paper is copyrighted by ASTM Press. For reprints, please contact ASTM at http://www.astm.com/ or at http://www.normas.com. PRACTICAL AE METHODOLOGY FOR USE ON AIRCRAFT John M. Carlyle1 and Harvey L. Bodine2 Robert L. Dawes2, Steven S. Henley2, Robert Demeski, Eric v. K. Hill3 REFERENCE: Carlyle, J.M, and Bodine, H.L., "Practical AE Methodology for Use on Aircraft", Acoustic Emission: Standards and Technology Update, ASTM STP 1353, S.J. Vahaviolos, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1998. ABSTRACT: The first production use of practical acoustic emission (AE) on aircraft was on the F-111, where more than 240 U.S. and Australian aircraft have been successfully monitored during cold proof testing since 1987. A key factor was the design of an instrument which automatically configured itself at power-on, so that aircraft testing could take place in a highly efficient and reliable manner. The second production use of AE on aircraft was on the VC-10, where an entire fleet of 22 aircraft was monitored 40 times during pneumatic proof pressurization. The monitoring of this large transport required anywhere from 282 to 313 narrowband AE sensors per aircraft. In both aircraft types, numerous significant defects were discovered through AE-based nondestructive testing. Finally, we present on-going in-flight AE research. This new research uses digital waveform processing of wideband AE signals and offers the potential of adding new and complementary capabilities to classical, narrowband AE.
1 Carlyle Consulting, 1009 Buckingham Way, Yardley, PA 190672 Martingale Research Corp., 1485 Richardson Drive, Suite 110, Richardson, TX 750803 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Aerospace Engineering Department, 6100 Clyde Morris Blvd., Daytona Beach, FL 32114-3900
REFERENCES
NOTE: Some of the material in this paper was based on work sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. |
|
|